Which situation would indicate a too-broad scope for a CMMC assessment?

A too-broad scope for a CMMC assessment is indicated by increased costs and unwieldy boundaries. This situation suggests that the assessment includes more than what is necessary to meet the organization's goals and compliance needs, potentially complicating the process and making it difficult to focus on essential security practices. When an assessment's scope is too large, it can lead to unnecessary expenditures, confusion, and inefficiencies as it may require extensive resources, time, and effort to assess various irrelevant or only tangentially related systems or processes. A well-defined scope should balance comprehensiveness with practicality, ensuring that the assessment remains focused on critical areas that directly impact security posture and compliance without becoming burdensome.

The other choices do not capture the essence of a too-broad scope. An easily manageable set of boundaries implies a focused and effective assessment. Proper due diligence in protecting information indicates that an organization is responsibly safeguarding its data, which is contrary to the notion of an overly expansive scope. Lastly, a narrow view of security requirements suggests limited flexibility, which does not align with the complexities usually associated with a broader assessment scope.